Hope Evaporates - Stock Market Plummets

President Obama’s election campaign focused on change he would bring that would turnaround the economy. The team of economic advisers he introduced only days after his election testified to the priority he intended to give to the economy. Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve Board Chairman, lent great credibility as the head of that advisory group and expectations for an economic recovery began to spread.

The hope for a reversal of economic fortunes began to unravel with Obama’s controversial selection of Timothy Geithner as Secretary of the Treasury. It was eroded further by reports that Larry Summers, the head of the National Economic Council, was giving a cold shoulder to Volcker and assuming dictatorial power over economic matters.

Hope evaporated entirely on February 10, 2009 when the oft-delayed plan to rescue the financial system was revealed in a speech by Secretary Geithner that contained no meaningful solutions. The Obama administration allowed Geithner to be the spokesperson for its much heralded rescue plan, and Geithner demonstrated that neither he nor anyone else on this new economic team has a clue on how to fix the problems.

The financial markets were stunned that President Obama had somehow turned the economic destiny of the nation over to Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Larry Summers, and Tim Geithner. There appears to be a growing realization that President Obama has very little understanding of the financial markets.

Stock market participants were hopeful that the carefully placed leaks in the days preceding Geithner’s speech were designed to whet their appetites for a bigger announcement. At the end of the speech, it was apparent that this administration simply delayed the speech, while fruitlessly hoping that someone would invent a solution.

Anger replaced hope on February 10th and people questioned if the Secretary of the Treasury should resign. The stock market shed more than 382 points amidst growing despair that the nation faces four long years.

Federal Reserve Board Needs To Stop Approving Goofy Bank Holding Companies

The recent vote by Federal Reserve Board Governor Elizabeth Duke opposing the application of GMAC LLC to become a bank holding company deserves high praise. The only reason GMAC, CIT Group, American Express, Discover Financial, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley decided to become bank holding companies was because that was the only goofy way former Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson figured non-bank firms could access TARP funds.

No CEO in their right mind would knowingly reorganize their company so it could be regulated by the Federal Reserve. Just what they needed – another regulator looking over their shoulder!

The Fed is digging a regulatory hole for itself that will prove embarrassing. Insurance companies, such as Genworth, Hartford Financial, Lincoln National, and Protective Life, whose stocks and bonds have been hammered due to observed weakness in their balance sheets, are all acquiring banks and/or forming bank holding companies to access TARP funds.

In approving the Protective Life Corporation’s application to become a bank holding company by acquiring the Bank of Bonifay and its holding company, the Fed went overboard to help the FDIC because that Bank was operating under a cease and desist order and its capital was insufficient given its risk profile. Protective Life was downgraded by Standard & Poors on January 15, 2009 the very date the Fed approved its holding company application. S & P stated: “…Protective Life maintains a relative risky investment portfolio with sizable exposure to commercial real estate and BBB and below-investment-grade fixed-income securities.”

The Fed is simply not prepared to deal with the regulatory problems it is bring on itself by approving these absurd combinations. Let’s hope Fed Governor Duke’s view on this matter gains traction.